With nearly 50 years experience in looking up at the sky, over 35 years experience in reading aeroplane magazines, & at least 100 hours on Microsoft Flight Simulator, the Centre for Realistic Aviation Perceptions (CRAP), is well placed to give insightful, relevant commentary on today's global aviation industry.
A Word About Photos
Where possible, any images used are sourced from public domains unless otherwise stated & credited. If you find a photo or image that you believe you own & breaches copyright, please let us know & it will be removed immediately.
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
Lowering the F-35 Bar
Question: What do you do when the plane you want doesn't meet the specifications you set? Do you:
Choose a new plane?
Make the existing plane better?
Change the specifications to match the plane you have?
Being the peaceful-loving guy I am, I try to stay out of military matters. But the recent announcement that the US Dept of Defence intends to "lower the performance requirements" for the F-35 just seems somewhat incredulous.
Sighting faults, failures & extensive delays, the report casts a big shadow over the seemingly impressive recent announcement of the delivery of 30 F-35's during the 2012 calendar year. It seems it's not the quantity that counts, but quality, & on that front, the F-35 still has a long way to go.
At least matching the specs to the plane, not the other way around, should at least make it easier to convince Congress, & all the foreign Governments, including Australia, that have signed up for it, that the plane is performing "as specified" & ensure ongoing funding. What was that Eisenhower said about the industrial-military complex?